Post by account_disabled on Jan 8, 2024 18:57:34 GMT 8
Afacts. Recognition procedure Recently the Competition Council has focused a lot on the recognition of the facts by the investigated companies which can bring them a reduction of the sanction applied between and of the basic level the minimum that can be applied reaching up to . of the turnover registered by the company in the year prior to sanctioning. However even if the competition authority encourages this practice it must be remembered that only resorting to the recognition procedure cannot reduce the amount of the fine up to .. In order to be able to reach this amount it is.
Necessary for the investigated companies to demonstrate the incidence of Country Email List other mitigating circumstances such as the company involved provides evidence that it put an end to the infringement as soon as the competition authority intervened the enterprise provides evidence that its participation in the committed violation is extremely low and thus demonstrates that during the period in which it was party to the violation it effectively avoided its implementation adopting fair competitive behavior on the market the turnover achieved on the marketmarkets on which the infringement took place represents a relatively small part up to of the total turnover of the enterprise provided that this fact can be established with certainty the company involved cooperated effectively.
And fully with the Competition Council beyond its legal obligation to cooperate the companys anticompetitive behavior was authorized or encouraged by public authorities or by existing legislation the enterprise proves the existence and effective implementation of a program for compliance with competition rules other circumstances of the nature of the above and which were recognized as mitigating circumstances by the competition authority through its decisions. ConCluSIonS As can be seen the competition authority has recently been paying close attention to vertical relationships between suppliers and distributors especially regarding resale prices.have not been put into practice can lead to penalties. There are numerous other investigations completed during.
Necessary for the investigated companies to demonstrate the incidence of Country Email List other mitigating circumstances such as the company involved provides evidence that it put an end to the infringement as soon as the competition authority intervened the enterprise provides evidence that its participation in the committed violation is extremely low and thus demonstrates that during the period in which it was party to the violation it effectively avoided its implementation adopting fair competitive behavior on the market the turnover achieved on the marketmarkets on which the infringement took place represents a relatively small part up to of the total turnover of the enterprise provided that this fact can be established with certainty the company involved cooperated effectively.
And fully with the Competition Council beyond its legal obligation to cooperate the companys anticompetitive behavior was authorized or encouraged by public authorities or by existing legislation the enterprise proves the existence and effective implementation of a program for compliance with competition rules other circumstances of the nature of the above and which were recognized as mitigating circumstances by the competition authority through its decisions. ConCluSIonS As can be seen the competition authority has recently been paying close attention to vertical relationships between suppliers and distributors especially regarding resale prices.have not been put into practice can lead to penalties. There are numerous other investigations completed during.